Throughout a July 2020 webinar, Andrey Zharkov, the previous Alrosa president who now heads lab-grown enterprise Extremely C, made a daring prediction: Lab-grown diamonds would quickly be valued on a “cost-plus” mannequin.
“In two or three years, we’ll see extra pricing for laboratory-grown diamonds primarily based on benchmarking,” he mentioned.
Practically three years later, that hasn’t occurred, however an growing variety of individuals within the lab-grown house need it to.
Marty Hurwitz, CEO of MV Advertising and marketing and a lab-grown guide, not too long ago printed a “manifesto” arguing the trade ought to cease pricing its gadgets primarily based on the Rapaport listing. (In response to MV analysis, 57% of lab-grown sellers use the Rap listing for each sale.) Joanna Park-Tonks, the brand new head of the Worldwide Grown Diamond Affiliation, has mentioned the identical.
It is smart to go “off Rap.” The lab-grown commerce has a distinct supply-demand profile, and totally different market dynamics, than the pure enterprise. It additionally devalues the product when lab-grown diamonds are offered for greater than 95% off the Rapaport listing. On high of that, the listing’s namesake, Martin Rapaport, is a vituperative critic of lab-grown.
Nonetheless, if the experiences of the pure trade are any information, the lab-grown trade can have a tough time weaning itself off the listing. It has virtually develop into a sample: Each time pure diamond costs drop—and these days lab-grown costs have dropped sharply—sellers complain concerning the listing and search options. They even write manifestos. And, in the long run, they arrive again.
Why? For one, Rapaport and his crew are plugged into the market. Some desire the Rap sheet’s opacity and complexity to a extra simple listing. However the more than likely reply is behavior. The commerce wants each a supply of worth data and common language. For many years, that’s been Rap.
The created-gem enterprise claims to be about bucking custom. Getting “off Rap” shouldn’t be onerous. Hurwitz has proposed that, since “lab-grown diamonds aren’t grown in as many colours and clarities as mined diamonds,” the trade ought to arrange an online portal, the place growers anonymously enter costs as soon as per week. That will generate an aggregated listing. (One other, maybe extra scientific, approach to do that can be to make use of transaction information from on-line exchanges or e-tail websites.) If they like, firms may supply stones utilizing each the Rap and different lists. Ultimately, merchants will favor one or the opposite.
If the lab-grown enterprise is really rethinking the way it’s pricing gems, it may also take the chance to maneuver away from one other difficult legacy system utilized by the commerce: the GIA grading scale.
The largest argument for created diamonds goes like this: Study two gems facet by facet. Apart from lab-growns with noticeable tinges attributable to therapy—a not-insignificant a part of the enterprise—it’s often unattainable to inform one from the opposite. So why ought to one be extra fascinating than the opposite? Why is yet another priceless?
Then again, should you present individuals a D and E diamond, or a VS1 or a VS2, most individuals can’t inform the distinction both. But, one continues to be price greater than the opposite, and the lab-grown trade has no drawback with that. A very helpful grading scale can be primarily based on visible distinctions that may be noticed by shoppers, not simply gemologists with microscopes.
The person-made trade is much extra tech-oriented than the standard diamond enterprise. With a bit algorithmic tinkering—probably guided by synthetic intelligence—it shouldn’t be unattainable to develop a greater technique to rank readability, lower, and colour than a 69-year-old legacy scale. It’d even deal with the tinge drawback. These new scores might be supplied alongside the usual grades. And once more, finally one system will probably be most popular over the opposite.
There’s a precedent for this. Within the Nineteen Nineties, when Hurwitz’s firm started selling champagne (brown) diamonds for the Argyle mine, it launched a proprietary colour scale: C1 via C7. That scale isn’t used a lot now, however it gave the product a degree of differentiation, a novelty that set it aside. Till it shut down, Argyle supplied two studies at its pink tenders—one from Argyle primarily based by itself scale, the opposite from GIA. The U.S. market favored the GIA grades, execs instructed me, whereas abroad markets have been extra fascinated with Argyle’s.
If a brand new scale is really helpful, even the pure trade would possibly undertake it. Which might be a formidable swap—the pure trade imitating the lab-grown.
For now, in fact, many of the lab market’s strides have been on the again of the pure trade. As an alternative of making an attempt to develop a brand new client section, growers have principally focused the established engagement ring market. Plus, they use the Rap listing and GIA’s 4Cs scale. For a sector that bristles on the phrase imitation, all of it feels a bit imitative—to not point out lazy.
By following the patterns set by the pure trade, the lab-grown enterprise has discovered itself with an analogous set of issues, together with a commoditized product, decreasing margins, and costs dictated principally by on-line sellers and low-wage nations. We hear some growers are discovering earnings so squeezed, they’re growing direct-to-consumer (D2C) efforts. (Many already promote D2C. Some are open about it, others aren’t.)
The lab-grown enterprise must develop into its personal trade. For the second, it not solely apes the pure enterprise, some firms have an unhealthy obsession with bringing it down. It’s not simply harping on mines’ eco-impact—whereas virtually at all times omitting their very own. Each time one thing terrible occurs at a diamond mine, lab firms produce a flurry of LinkedIn posts celebrating these human tragedies with a pleasure that looks like Christmas.
But, contemplating that lab-grown costs are primarily based on the Rap listing—and the 2 industries are intertwined—this makes little sense as a long-term technique. However possibly a few of these firms don’t care about the long run.
It’s no secret some tech-oriented growers view lab-grown gems as a fast money-raising ploy, which can permit them to develop artificial diamonds for industrial functions. (It’s not clear how properly that’s labored.) These growers don’t care concerning the well being of the jewellery enterprise. They didn’t develop up in it; they’ve little curiosity in sticking round. Some Indian producers additionally see lab-grown as a fad. And simply as they rushed to enter the trade, some at the moment are rushing to get out.
That’s brought on some within the lab-grown diamond enterprise to confess it’s time to vary course. The trendy lab-grown commerce is just a few years previous. It has an opportunity to do one thing new and fascinating and totally different. To date, it principally hasn’t. And to date, that’s principally labored.
However, because the saying goes, nothing lasts endlessly. These days, the ride-sharing, social media, video streaming, crypto, e-commerce, and delivery app sectors have confronted severe reckonings, following lengthy durations of seemingly unstoppable progress.
A few of these companies stemmed from revolutionary concepts. However, they typically had flawed enterprise fashions, constructed on what’s known as “counterfeit capitalism.” Enterprise capital money fueled their fast enlargement, however they didn’t have a lot of a plan past that. They brought on havoc of their respective industries, as they have been meant to. However they’ve had a troublesome time rising from the wreckage. That would begin to occur to lab-grown. Some suppose it already has.
Picture: Getty Photographs
Observe JCK on Instagram: @jckmagazine
Observe JCK on Twitter: @jckmagazine
Observe JCK on Fb: @jckmagazine